Rambler63 wrote:
Sub--
There are a lot of crossover/gray areas where the numbers can go either way. Consider facilities, medical expenses, administrator salaries and benefits, and merchandising. When people buy a WSU t-shirt, most of them consider the academic part of the institution as well as the sports team, even if it just says "Shockers" or "Wichita State" with no logo. If an administrator making $200k or more (plus benefits) works in the President's office but spends most of their time overseeing the athletic department and their facilities, that expense is probably not in the athletic budget. What is the extra cost of insurance to cover the athletic department and their higher rate of knee surgeries and MRIs? What is the opportunity cost of donations specifically for sports or sports-only facilities-- would the same effort yield a similar donation for the biology department? How do you credit donations for multipurpose facilities that are primarily for sports? Are part of the salaries and benefits for people in the Development, Marketing, and other areas of the institution that work on athletic-related projects counted as an expense to the athletic department? And how are scholarships for athletics counted, if at all?
WSU is an exceptionally well-functioning athletic department with (as your fans often brag) some of the best attendance and most loyal fans in all of college sports. If WSU is, as you say, just into the black with their athletic department, what does that mean for schools like Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Pepperdine, UMKC, Drexel, or any school drawing 4000 or less per game for men's basketball?
No doubt that a lot of those things can be attributed to a number of areas in some form. But basketball and football generate a lot of T-Shirt Fans. More so than the other sports. I'm not sure how all of the insurance costs are taken into account as I haven't looked that into things.
Scholarships are supported by SASO (Shocker Athletic Scholarship Organization) donations which are a part of every season ticket sold. At least to basketball. Optional giving is accepted for other sports. Baseball might require SASO donations though I'm not sure.
And you're right about us having an advantage over a number of other schools due to a large and loyal fanbase. We also have very reasonable ticket prices considering. I think they want to raise ticket prices and season ticket requirements, but won't do so until the local economy is in better shape. Wichita is still struggling a bit due to the reliance on aviation. But I'd also say that we spend a lot more than those schools do on their programs. Yes, the advantage of having money and not having to pinch pennies for fear of being in the red. And I'm not going to lie, big money donors help. I know a private plane is at the disposal of Coach Marshall just about anytime he wants for recruiting or a family vacation. I don't think that comes out of the budget at all and is a perk he and his assistants enjoy.
I know we had some financial issues in the late 80s, which lead to the disbanding of the football program, that carried over into the 90s. I don't think the numbers were horrible in the 90s, but they were mostly in the red. But we still had a very loyal fanbase but poor leadership at the top. And AD and President that couldn't generate anything. It wasn't until around 2000 when President Beggs came in and hired AD Schaus. Prior to those additions, basketball was averaging between 6 and 7 thousand. Baseball was turning a profit though. Their vision lead to a renovated arena and a rejuvinated fanbase. I want to say that we haven't been in the red since at least 2002.
But I'm not going to appologize for having big money donors who care about both the academic and athletic sides of this university. Those donors are important to every school out there. Charles Koch, love him or hate him, has given so much to both sides of the University and I've heard may be a big influence on the direction the school is taking to grow itself with our new Innovation Campus. That will be huge for academics and is only going to help athletics as it offers more opportunities for student-athlete in the future. Not that he's overly involved, but I think his support of President Bardo's ideas go a long way.
At this point, I have no idea if I've answered anything.