Ramblermania.net https://www.ramblermania.net:443/forum/ |
|
Patrick Schultz https://www.ramblermania.net:443/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=2417 |
Page 2 of 6 |
Author: | #PROUDMOM [ Thu May 10, 2018 6:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
His position is phased out. |
Author: | 01grad [ Thu May 10, 2018 7:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
That’s not good. |
Author: | brot4britu [ Thu May 10, 2018 7:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
MOM says it was phase out ~~ If so. there had to be a nice severance !! |
Author: | swellafelon [ Thu May 10, 2018 7:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
This sucks big time. I guess they had to save money somehow to pay for Porter's raise, so they decided to balance the books on the back of one of their longest and most loyal employees. Smells like a Tom Kelly move... |
Author: | natetheskate [ Thu May 10, 2018 10:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
so. there had to be a nice severance !! Do not think so |
Author: | brot4britu [ Thu May 10, 2018 10:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
Cmon Nate !! A severance package IS the moral thing to do---Last I looked LUC ia a MORAL institution-- A package for PAT would hardly make a dent in PORTER's NEW ARRANGEMENT--and I doubt PM would countenance such a thing !! |
Author: | SisterJean’s#1Pupil [ Fri May 11, 2018 12:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
No one worked harder to keep Bo. This man stuffed the ballots at a women’s volleyball game to circumvent the AD back then. Loyola legend. |
Author: | 440Rambler [ Fri May 11, 2018 7:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
As an HR Professional I would be completely shocked if Pat's position was phased out (ie. eliminated) and they didn't offer him a severance package. He is in a protected class, and had a long tenure. The severance package would protect the school from legal action & not offering one would be a completely unnecessary risk that I just can't believe the school would take. |
Author: | GoRamblers [ Fri May 11, 2018 7:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
swellafelon wrote: This sucks big time. I guess they had to save money somehow to pay for Porter's raise, so they decided to balance the books on the back of one of their longest and most loyal employees. Smells like a Tom Kelly move... It's my understanding that this happened before or very early in the NCAA run. So Porter's raise had nothing to do with it. |
Author: | 01grad [ Fri May 11, 2018 7:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Patrick Shultz |
GoRamblers wrote: swellafelon wrote: This sucks big time. I guess they had to save money somehow to pay for Porter's raise, so they decided to balance the books on the back of one of their longest and most loyal employees. Smells like a Tom Kelly move... It's my understanding that this happened before or very early in the NCAA run. So Porter's raise had nothing to do with it. Im pretty sure he was still with the Department during the Tournament. When I saw him in San Antonio, I believe he was still working for the school. |
Page 2 of 6 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |