RamblerRagas wrote:
We welcome Porter back. Even if all we get at first are several 15-20 win seasons we'll get structure, discipline, system, culture reboot, and have identity on both ends of floor again. I think we'd all be happy here again.
Disagree. I know I may be in the minority, but I don't think Porter is a good idea to bring back. The game has changed since he left. It's hard to keep everything together, only bring in a transfer or two every year, and succeed. Oklahoma is struggling with him and his system right now. Marquette is having a bad year and Shaka is driving the no transfer bus. You either need to be a top level school that gets one and done players or find the right guys to transfer in and mesh with your high school recruits.
If there's a change at HC, no one wants several 15-20 win seasons. I think there needs to be a quicker turnaround. Hypothetically a coach can bring the players he has with him from the previous school. If we're a great basketball school that everyone thinks we are, then we should be near the top of the A10 in year 2 or 3, just like SLU just did.
Also, a seemingly very unpopular opinion: I say give Drew another year. He fixed it before. We were first place just 2 years ago. Last year we were top 4 despite some key injuries at the start of conference play. This year is really bad, but I'm still slightly optimistic for next year if we can keep the pieces together. How many times did people want Porter fired? He would take a step forward, then a step back multiple times. Just think we should let Drew adjust again and show he can get us back up top.