jim wrote:
We do need to be realistic. Skanks did not start at ND.. he brings some things but also has limitations. He may start to take pressure off Krutwig. He is not as good of a rebounder as Kirby who is not a great rebounder. He can score and block shots.
Given he has foul problems his playing time will always be limited.
There will be a few games where he will be on fire and tough to stop.
He is a great pick up and will fill a role on the team.
I think Shanks is an upgrade over Kirby, but we don't need him for 30 minutes a game. Unlike at UND, where he was probably asked to do a lot, we could take the 15 minutes a game even if he gets in foul trouble. Shanks' contributions plus the additions of Krutwig/Negron will give us reinforcements down low that we didn't have last year. If the small-ball lineup is working, we don't need to rely as heavily on them. If we're getting dominated down low, they'll at least stop the bleeding.
In terms of recruiting, I'm giving Porter an A- maybe a pessimistic B+, his only knock being the frequency of transfers/roster turnover he's overseen. In terms of coaching and getting results, he's obviously not at an A-/B+ based on his record. That said, this might be the easiest LU team he's had to coach because we won't live and die by one thing (on offense: shooting % especially from 3%; on defense: help defense with a smaller lineup). Even if Shanks isn't the second coming of Tim Duncan, he's able to contribute for a good 10-15 minutes and not sit on the bench like Granic did for virtually all of conference play. That alone could make up a lot of difference in the close games we coughed up last year.