JCT wrote:
Let's go back in this discussion a little.... What does a CIT bid get you?
1. For us, it removes a huge stumbling block of not being in a post-season tournament of any kind for 30 years.
2. It gives your current kids and coaches experience playing in postseason, even if it is a lesser tournament than desired.
3. It extends the final season for your seniors (Christian Thomas and Joe Crisman), who gave a lot to see this program through lean and difficult seasons-- including a terrible year in 2011-12, a season without Butler in the HL (not what they signed up for), and a tough first year in the MVC.
4. It is a huge positive for fans, and a good way to build your fan base for the future-- which we need desperately.
5. It is a great plus for your student fans, to create a better connection to Loyola sports and elevate athletics in the mindset of students.
Most of these things are difficult to monetize. But so many schools have used the C-tournaments as a springboard to build a foundation for success (Wichita State-- CBI in 2009, Harvard-- CIT in 2010, Valpo and Northern Iowa-- CIT in 2011, with each of these schools reaching the NIT in following the following year, and the NCAA the year or two after that). And once in the NCAA or NIT tournament, the returning players have the experience to handle tournament play and win a game or two.
It would be one thing if tournament appearances were a common thing for us; Northern Iowa had a disappointing season last year and deliberately took themselves out of the running for a C-tournament bid even before Arch Madness. But we really need a building block like this to put the 30 year drought behind us, and lay a cornerstone for next season and beyond.
JCT - I think all of your reasons are spot on. I'd love to see us play in the CIT and I was actually planning on making a donation if we accepted an invite. Unfortunately, my stock portfolio took a hit these last three days so I guess the donation will have to be a bit less than I anticipated. : /