natetheskate wrote:
couple thoughts.
I also wondered what the effect of losing Sean Dwyer was...and other coaches over the last couple years...You would have to say the full transition from Porter to Drew has been completed? This includes style of play as well as coaches, players and style.
You have to wonder if Jalen Quin and Jayden Dawson would have helped? It makes you wonder the value of experience in a system vs raw talent. This constant turnover of rosters year after year is tough on fans and teams...You could make a case that Mercyhurst won because they had playing experience together. All 5 starters were on the team last year and the two top subs...We basically have Rubin and then Moore and Houinso who both played limited time last year...Glaskov also has a year of experience but has shown zip. This constant turn over leads to wasting the non-con season to figuring things out.
It seems like the Valentine system is almost about creating chaos and having superior physical talent and depth win the chaos battle. This kind of system leads to people being out of position all the time hence turnover and rebounding issues...Remember Porters system? it was all about being in position. We used to complain that we didnt fast break...and why? so we could always be in correct defensive position and not give up an easy basket. The kicker here is you cant run a successful fast break without rebounding.
Any way lets see if we can pull this together by the time the A-10 rolls around.
The inexperience reasoning makes sense when talking about playing teams with a lot of returning minutes. But falls short in most cases. Cleveland State returned ZERO minutes. Most teams we play in non-con (and have played in non-con in prior seasons) return fewer minutes than us. Just about everyone has major roster turnover nowadays so I just don't buy it as an excuse. I actually think we are near the top of the A10 in returning minutes, believe it or not.
It comes down to coaching and effort. Both are severely lacking.