goramblers2011 wrote:
I don't think we wouldn't have made the tourney the past three years even if we stayed in the Valley. 22-23--we weren't good. 23-24--would have had just as good of chance in the Valley, but I don't think we were better than Drake or ISUb. And Bradley beat us in the NIT. 24-25--we aren't as good as Drake is this year. Would have been in the top 3/4 alongside Bradley and UNI. I think we are slightly better than both this year but behind Drake.
Also a good point. With the double-bye, it's not like our path in the conference tourney was THAT much harder than it would have been in the MVC. And once in the big dance, every team is at least as good as VCU or Drake. I want to be good enough to beat really good teams, not good enough to squeak into the tournament.
When I think of the whole A10 vs. MVC debate, at the end of the day the A10 raises the ceiling of our program considerably. That's how we get the talent to make deep tourney runs again (I think we're knocking on the door), and become a program like Dayton or VCU that is consistent contender.