It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 4:56 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2016 10:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 2:36 pm
Posts: 335
Playing with our roster for the upcoming season, and seeing a lot of nice potential.
Nice combinations of big or small lineups.
Good blend of veterans and rookies.
Guess I am drinking the Rambler Koolaid.
Anyone with me here?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2016 10:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 04, 2013 1:54 pm
Posts: 2430
Yup !! I'm in !! See my posts re us and the Valley sand WSU !! Gist of which is we are as good as anyone in Valley and better than most.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2016 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 04, 2013 12:11 pm
Posts: 4831
Hard to say how good we are going to be since we only have five active, returning players.

I definitely like the recruits on paper, but I haven't seen any of them play (hopefully in a couple months before their Spain trip!). To compete at the top of the league, we need one of the big men to play at Montel's level and at least one more to improve. I'm also a little concerned about the experience level of our guards. Custer is our only true point guard. Milt can fill in there, but I like him more playing off the ball.

_________________
MBB Scholarship Chart


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2016 12:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:41 am
Posts: 1070
I agree with Ahunte on guard concerns. Ben and Milt are the only healthy guards who are returning. Tyson may or may not be ready by midseason. Then it's Clayton, Bruno, Cam, and Jake Baughman (our walk on). Marques Townes would be a huge help if he could play this year.

I anticipate the roster actually utilizing the wing position with Ingram and Chastain. It's gonna be weird not seeing us have to play 4 guards at a time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2016 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:56 am
Posts: 3929
Location: Chicago, Illinois
I'm mystified by the possible starting lineups.

Custer, Richardson, Doyle, Ingram, Chastain/Andres/Granic?

If we wanted to go really big for a stretch to create a matchup problem, we could have Doyle (6'4") running the point, Ingram (6'6") at shooting guard, Andres (6'7") at wing, and Rajala (6'9"), Granic (6'9") or Kirby (6'9") up front.

There's a real logjam at the shooting guard/small forward spot: Doyle, Richardson, Satterwhite, Chastain, Skokna, Andres, Jackson, and Tyson Smith eventually.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2016 3:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:41 am
Posts: 1070
JCT wrote:
There's a real logjam at the shooting guard/small forward spot: Doyle, Richardson, Satterwhite, Chastain, Skokna, Andres, Jackson, and Tyson Smith eventually.



Given the available information I anticipate Andres playing the 5 spot and Jackson the four. If i had to guess the starting lineup for the first game i'd say it's:

Custer
Richardson
Doyle
Ingram
Andres

Though if Jackson is similar to CT as advertised i'd gladly take
Custer
Doyle
Ingram
Jackson
Andres

With Ben Richardson leading the second unit.

On paper our roster is so much more versatile this year. Way more variety in the front court (for example Gronic made 57 3's last year but still averaged 10 boards). If these new recruits are as good as advertised we're in great shape... Man this is a fun time. Is it November yet?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:49 pm
Posts: 2860
Location: Chicago, IL
Don't get your hopes up, don't get your hopes up, don't get your hopes up, don't get your hopes up...

Aw, screw it. GO RAMBLERS!

_________________
Cigarboy sucks!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 1:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 04, 2013 1:54 pm
Posts: 2430
Now that's funny GO !! Love it !!

Truth to tell, we will be a changed team--Hopefully Porter will meld our NEW increased size to his style . I would hope that "his style" will be tweeked to accommodate--It has to be done just right--If he forces HIS system unchanged ( un-tweeked) we will be in trouble. I do NOT see this happening--He DID recruit SIZE foe a reason !

GO RAMBLERS !!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group Color scheme by ColorizeIt!