Ramblerguy wrote:
I thought we just did that less than a year ago. I assume a contract was negotiated, and agreed to by both the school and the coach. It's just a piece of paper right? If he underperforms over the next season or two, does the school have the right to not honor the same paper? Will any power school extend a four or five year window to an incoming coach to succeed? If any coach wanted a long term contract and got one why shouldn't they complete the same... Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge PM fan, but how does this program get to a constant level of performance without stability of coaching and staff? I thought we wanted consistent and long term success, not a carousel of being used as stepping stones for something better. I thought we thought we are something better? Are we, or are we delusional in our expectations?
I will not reply any further as this is all subjective and there are no absolute answers, but these are my opinions.
It’s business.... it’s not personal. Yes Loyola would like long term success and from everything that Porter has said he does too. We still don’t have any information that he is trying to leave, there’s no reason to emotional over this. Even if he did leave I couldn’t be too upset, as everyone already said he accomplished so much for the school already. Loyola does not have the money to match a P5 school offer... if he gets a dream offer I can’t be upset for the guy. It would simply be selfish of me as a fan to not support him getting a dream offer. I think we’re all hoping he stays though. As I said earlier there’s no actual information released that says he’s going anywhere, it’s a waste of time and energy to get upset about this before anything has even happened.