BigJoe1963 wrote:
I also don't want to get political, but I am not willing to die or kill others so that someone can have a beer at the ballpark or dinner with friends. This sucks, I get it, and it is frustrating, but are we really advocating risking our lives and the lives of people we care about for the sake of a dollar?
That is a real question, is money more important than people? Without testing and tracing are we not saying that we should all risk our lives for the sake of money?
I work part-time at Wrigley Field as a bartender, that job is not happening any time soon. My other job is a full-time real estate agent and I am taking a hit there as well, as people are pulling away from making the biggest financial decisions of their life during this. I want things back to normal as much as anyone, but if you are asking me who I would be willing to kill to make it happen, the answer is no one.
I don't envy our politicians during these times. The decisions ahead are incredibly difficult. Do we maintain social distancing, etc. until a vaccine? Have fun telling 350 million Americans that they can't eat out at restaurants or go to sporting events or weddings or funerals for some unknown length of time--quite possibly until late 2021. Things would get ugly and hardly any businesses will survive. How long do the "stay-at-home" orders stay in effect? Originally, the stay-at-home was to prevent overcrowding at hospitals. At what point do we say "OK, we've gotten past that initial fear, what can we do now?" I think another month or so is necessary. I see Wisconsin already extended to late May--Illinois won't be far behind.
But that's all balanced by the risk of loss of life. There's been a lot of studies done and papers written by bioethicists and economists on striking the balance. Those papers were all hypothetical and worked with specific numbers. One of the biggest problems now is just how little know about what we are facing. It is extremely difficult to make these critical decisions when the models vary so wildly, when we don't know who or how many have already had COVID, when we don't know the true death rate, etc. Which model do we trust when one says "60k deaths" and another says "6 million deaths"?
Anyways, on basketball, and on a selfish level, it'd REALLY suck to see next year's team not be able to play.