Ramblermania.net
https://www.ramblermania.net:443/forum/

USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas
https://www.ramblermania.net:443/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=3091
Page 1 of 3

Author:  kato669 [ Tue Feb 09, 2021 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:  USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

Loyola and Drake listed along with BYU, Belmont and Winthrop

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaab/2021/02/09/2021-march-madness-cinderella-teams/4436559001/

Author:  Blers42 [ Tue Feb 09, 2021 10:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

“In 2018, coach Porter Moser took the Ramblers (17-3) to the Final Four. This group isn't as special as that remarkable team, but the same winning recipe has been coming to fruition of late.”

How is this team not as special? It’s not even March yet.

Author:  LU 86 [ Wed Feb 10, 2021 8:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/remember-loyola-this-team-is-even-better-than-the-one-that-made-the-final-four/

even better article

Author:  ahunte1 [ Wed Feb 10, 2021 8:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

LU 86 wrote:


That's a great article. Thanks for posting!

Author:  Dansen [ Wed Feb 10, 2021 9:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

Loved this graphic

Attachments:
55B4748C-428E-4BDB-BAB0-9BF25FF178CA.png
55B4748C-428E-4BDB-BAB0-9BF25FF178CA.png [ 75.79 KiB | Viewed 16667 times ]

Author:  kato669 [ Wed Feb 10, 2021 9:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

LU 86 wrote:


Yeah, much better :)

Quite a contrast in the two articles, though it's understandable that USA Today is more lukewarm/milk toast since they are hardly known for their sports reporting.

Author:  swellafelon [ Wed Feb 10, 2021 10:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

Great article LU 86 posted, but I'm going to quibble with its claim that Marquise is the highest rated recruit in Rambler history.

For one thing, we have two players on our current roster who are higher rated, in terms of # of stars at least, in Anderson and Agunanne.

Second, I'm sure JCT, with his encyclopedic knowledge of Rambler history, can come up with additional higher-rated players from our past. Two that come to mind for me are Keith Gailes and Gerald Hayward, both of whom I'm pretty sure were Top 100 recruits per Street & Smith magazine, in the pre-internet era. (I remember stalking the newsstands in the fall waiting for their College Basketball Preview issue to arrive, along with previews by Sporting News and Lindy's.)
I highly suspect that LaRue Martin was higher-rated too.

Edit: I finally clicked on the link in the article relating to the Kennedy rating claim. I see that Big Frank was rated below Marquise by 247. One could also argue that Damezi is not a "recruit" but a transfer.
I guess my quibble boils down to the fact that the writer of the article is a Millennial punk who thinks history began with the invention of the internet.
But still a great article :D

Author:  bmh_twosix [ Wed Feb 10, 2021 11:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

Seems like everyone decided it was "release my article on Loyola" week.

Writer of this one is a student at Northwestern and a great follow on Twitter (@CBBCentral).


Author:  LU 86 [ Wed Feb 10, 2021 11:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

I'm going with Bernard Jackson 1982 Phillips, he did transfer from Wichita State. He was Chicago Player of the Year

Author:  swellafelon [ Wed Feb 10, 2021 12:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: USA Today article, NCAA Basketball Cinderellas

I believe Len Bertolini was also a Chicago prep POY.

Other highly rated Ramblers of more recent vintage that come to mind are transfers Cully Payne and Justin Cerasoli. I remember Cerasoli was ranked in Rivals Top 100, just ahead of Joachim Noah, and Payne was offered by DePaul as a high school freshman.

Goes to show that high school rankings are no guarantee of college success.

Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/