http://stats.nba.com/playerTracking.htmlhttp://www.stats.com/sportvu/basketball.aspI find this type of evaluation very interesting. It's used not only by the NBA but some of the top tier NCAA schools as well. It provides so much data it can be overwhelming. However, for a Loyola team that's undersized it could be a magic bullet that cuts through wasted practice time trying to be a team that it can't be and provide some clear cut strategies that could be successful.
1. A team that presses can collect data on where the most successful traps happen with who, where and against which opposing players.
2. Can show where a rebound is outleted, pushed up the court, and which sets are most productive. It will also collect data as to what entry points are most efficient with which players.
Anyway you get the general drift what this technology can do and its not subjective evaluation.
It's not cheap. I don't know what installation costs but I believe its a 125k a year subscription .
The rub is it becomes more valuable when everyone in the conference uses it. This seems to me to be a very easy do and could give not only Loyola an competitive edge but other Valley schools as well.
I think the best tools generated are for a pressing and pressure type of team, which Loyola better be if they are going to compete.