Yeah, it was nice to get the win, but when are we going to start cutting down on bonehead mistakes, and start learning which groups can play with each other? I thought we had a really good group on the court with Doyle, Thomas, O'Leary, Chrisman, and Turk (White was in foul trouble). But when Thomas got his second foul with 3:06 left in the first half and had to come out of the game, there was no leadership, and Doyle was double-teamed. Nobody else on the court seemed to know what to do, and no one seemed in any kind of rhythm. So Loyola's 3 point lead with 3:06 left in the first half turned into a 4 point UIC lead with :30 left. What I took from that is this team always has to have a big guy and a guard who can (and want to) score on the court at all times; if you don't have one or the other, the defense collapses and smothers us while the timid shooters keep passing between each other until there's a turnover. O'Leary doesn't really have the instinct to score first-- he's mostly a screener on offense, and a complimentary player. He needs to work on stepping up as a scorer when he's the only big guy out there-- posting up, working the high-low, piercing the zone. Thomas and Osborne do (or can do) that, so when they're missing from the court it causes us all kinds of problems.
The second half was full of moments where you could see the potential of the team, and some really silly mistakes. O'Leary's 50-mile an hour pass over the head of someone streaking to the basket, Crisman's air ball, Crisman's travel when UIC put on the half court press, leaving Humes wide open for 2 consecutive 3-pointers within 30 seconds near the end of the second half, etc.
I agree-- the crowd was very disappointing. I thought we'd have 2800 or so, based on previous games against UIC. I guess the higher ticket prices, the fact it's no longer a conference game, and the cold weather have really cut down on the UIC contingent. The students were good, but we need about 40% more of them.
|