roggirl wrote:
Thank you, gentlemen, for the history lesson.
But it is HISTORY.An empirical analysis comparing the Horizon League and the MVC, or a dissection of the politics of the Horizon League is certainly interesting, but it's not going to get rears in the seats at the Gentile NOW. Most of the people on this board are undoubtedly dedicated basketball fanatics. Most of the rest of the world are not. "The Rest" will go to basketball games if the team is winning, if it is fun, if it is affordable, if they can personally identify and relate to the team, if they find the opponents interesting from THEIR perspectives. And "the Rest" do not find the teams of the MVC particularly compelling. They're not necessarily WRONG.
Thank you for your comments, roggirl. I agree with a few of your points, especially about winning, and the more comfortable/familiar nature of the urbanness of the HL teams. I enjoyed visiting Milwaukee and Cleveland especially, and the Detroit fans were fun to hang out with-- top notch. I had some favorite restaturants in a couple of cities.
But men's basketball-wise (and, in fact, in women's volleyball, men's soccer, track and field, etc.) and in the way the two confrerences are run, the MVC is head and shoulders above the HL. Here's a tiny example that was evident in our first game of the year-- the MVC requires video replay be made available for officials to check, and it came in handy in the Milwaukee game to show that a UWM three pointer at the halftime buzzer came a fraction of a second after time had expired. First half of our very first game, BAM! Arch Madness, TV contracts, social media, the conference tournament formats, scheduling assistance/advice, athletic department consultation, and many other elements are stunningly superior, more equitable, and more professional. Maybe it's not plainly evident right away, but give it a chance.