GoRamblers wrote:
Also of note...our strength of schedule rank is 323. Ouch.
They're counting non-D1 games in this measurement, which I find surprising. Pretty interesting, though. They apply a score to each game. It pretty much matches what I've thought about the quality of our performance in each game-- Kent State was the best, Tulane was the worst (even worse than Michigan State), and Jackson State/UIC pretty much in the middle.
Our big problem in this ranking methodology is the VAR RK, where we're the 19th most inconsistent team in college basketball from our best performances to our worst. As I've said before, if we could play like we did against Kent State (or even UTSA) every game throughout the season, we'd finish around fourth in the conference and win 18-20 games.