Interesting tournament. I think we learned a lot about the team in the three games, who we can depend on to execute in certain situations, etc.
Aundre Jackson is really impressive. He plays so you hardly notice him out there on the court, but he piles up the numbers and plays very solid. He was 21 for 26 from the field over the three games for a 80.8 field goal percentage. And
he won MVC newcomer of the week.
Against Washington State, Loyola was up against two experienced seniors in the frontcourt who stand 6'10" and 7'0" respectively. And the team met the test, managing to stay close in points in the paint (WSU 40, LUC 36) and rebounds (WSU 33, LUC 32).
Custer, Richardson, Ingram, and Doyle all have the capabilities to strike for 20 points or more if they benefit from a mismatch. Or three or four of them could each hit 10-14 as they did for most of the games this year. The question is how much can we get from Satterwhite, Skokna, Granic, Smith (DNP against WSU), and Kirby on any given night? Having Chastain available is more significant than just watching him develop as a freshman, I really think he could have given us 10-15 productive minutes per game, which would mean less reliance on Satterwhite, Doyle, and Ingram.